GIT-CHECKOUT(1) Git Manual GIT-CHECKOUT(1)
NAME
git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree
SYNOPSIS
git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [<branch>]
git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [--detach] [<commit>]
git checkout [-q] [-f] [-m] [[-b|-B|--orphan] <new_branch>] [<start_point>]
git checkout [-f|--ours|--theirs|-m|--conflict=<style>] [<tree-ish>] [--] <paths>...
git checkout [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] [<paths>...]
DESCRIPTION
Updates files in the working tree to match the version in the index or
the specified tree. If no paths are given, git checkout will also
update HEAD to set the specified branch as the current branch.
git checkout <branch>
To prepare for working on <branch>, switch to it by updating the
index and the files in the working tree, and by pointing HEAD at
the branch. Local modifications to the files in the working tree
are kept, so that they can be committed to the <branch>.
If <branch> is not found but there does exist a tracking branch in
exactly one remote (call it <remote>) with a matching name, treat
as equivalent to
$ git checkout -b <branch> --track <remote>/<branch>
You could omit <branch>, in which case the command degenerates to
"check out the current branch", which is a glorified no-op with a
rather expensive side-effects to show only the tracking
information, if exists, for the current branch.
git checkout -b|-B <new_branch> [<start point>]
Specifying -b causes a new branch to be created as if git-branch(1)
were called and then checked out. In this case you can use the
--track or --no-track options, which will be passed to git branch.
As a convenience, --track without -b implies branch creation; see
the description of --track below.
If -B is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn't exist;
otherwise, it is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
$ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
$ git checkout <branch>
that is to say, the branch is not reset/created unless "git
checkout" is successful.
git checkout --detach [<branch>], git checkout <commit>
Prepare to work on top of <commit>, by detaching HEAD at it (see
"DETACHED HEAD" section), and updating the index and the files in
the working tree. Local modifications to the files in the working
tree are kept, so that the resulting working tree will be the state
recorded in the commit plus the local modifications.
Passing --detach forces this behavior in the case of a <branch>
(without the option, giving a branch name to the command would
check out the branch, instead of detaching HEAD at it), or the
current commit, if no <branch> is specified.
git checkout [-p|--patch] [<tree-ish>] [--] <pathspec>...
When <paths> or --patch are given, git checkout does not switch
branches. It updates the named paths in the working tree from the
index file or from a named <tree-ish> (most often a commit). In
this case, the -b and --track options are meaningless and giving
either of them results in an error. The <tree-ish> argument can be
used to specify a specific tree-ish (i.e. commit, tag or tree) to
update the index for the given paths before updating the working
tree.
The index may contain unmerged entries because of a previous failed
merge. By default, if you try to check out such an entry from the
index, the checkout operation will fail and nothing will be checked
out. Using -f will ignore these unmerged entries. The contents from
a specific side of the merge can be checked out of the index by
using --ours or --theirs. With -m, changes made to the working tree
file can be discarded to re-create the original conflicted merge
result.
OPTIONS
-q, --quiet
Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
-f, --force
When switching branches, proceed even if the index or the working
tree differs from HEAD. This is used to throw away local changes.
When checking out paths from the index, do not fail upon unmerged
entries; instead, unmerged entries are ignored.
--ours, --theirs
When checking out paths from the index, check out stage #2 (ours)
or #3 (theirs) for unmerged paths.
-b <new_branch>
Create a new branch named <new_branch> and start it at
<start_point>; see git-branch(1) for details.
-B <new_branch>
Creates the branch <new_branch> and start it at <start_point>; if
it already exists, then reset it to <start_point>. This is
equivalent to running "git branch" with "-f"; see git-branch(1) for
details.
-t, --track
When creating a new branch, set up "upstream" configuration. See
"--track" in git-branch(1) for details.
If no -b option is given, the name of the new branch will be
derived from the remote-tracking branch. If "remotes/" or
"refs/remotes/" is prefixed it is stripped away, and then the part
up to the next slash (which would be the nickname of the remote) is
removed. This would tell us to use "hack" as the local branch when
branching off of "origin/hack" (or "remotes/origin/hack", or even
"refs/remotes/origin/hack"). If the given name has no slash, or the
above guessing results in an empty name, the guessing is aborted.
You can explicitly give a name with -b in such a case.
--no-track
Do not set up "upstream" configuration, even if the
branch.autosetupmerge configuration variable is true.
-l
Create the new branch's reflog; see git-branch(1) for details.
--detach
Rather than checking out a branch to work on it, check out a commit
for inspection and discardable experiments. This is the default
behavior of "git checkout <commit>" when <commit> is not a branch
name. See the "DETACHED HEAD" section below for details.
--orphan <new_branch>
Create a new orphan branch, named <new_branch>, started from
<start_point> and switch to it. The first commit made on this new
branch will have no parents and it will be the root of a new
history totally disconnected from all the other branches and
commits.
The index and the working tree are adjusted as if you had
previously run "git checkout <start_point>". This allows you to
start a new history that records a set of paths similar to
<start_point> by easily running "git commit -a" to make the root
commit.
This can be useful when you want to publish the tree from a commit
without exposing its full history. You might want to do this to
publish an open source branch of a project whose current tree is
"clean", but whose full history contains proprietary or otherwise
encumbered bits of code.
If you want to start a disconnected history that records a set of
paths that is totally different from the one of <start_point>, then
you should clear the index and the working tree right after
creating the orphan branch by running "git rm -rf ." from the top
level of the working tree. Afterwards you will be ready to prepare
your new files, repopulating the working tree, by copying them from
elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
--ignore-skip-worktree-bits
In sparse checkout mode, git checkout -- <paths> would update only
entries matched by <paths> and sparse patterns in
$GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout. This option ignores the sparse
patterns and adds back any files in <paths>.
-m, --merge
When switching branches, if you have local modifications to one or
more files that are different between the current branch and the
branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is done, and
you will be on the new branch.
When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts and
mark the resolved paths with git add (or git rm if the merge should
result in deletion of the path).
When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you
recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths.
--conflict=<style>
The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
conflicting hunks are presented, overriding the merge.conflictstyle
configuration variable. Possible values are "merge" (default) and
"diff3" (in addition to what is shown by "merge" style, shows the
original contents).
-p, --patch
Interactively select hunks in the difference between the <tree-ish>
(or the index, if unspecified) and the working tree. The chosen
hunks are then applied in reverse to the working tree (and if a
<tree-ish> was specified, the index).
This means that you can use git checkout -p to selectively discard
edits from your current working tree. See the "Interactive Mode"
section of git-add(1) to learn how to operate the --patch mode.
<branch>
Branch to checkout; if it refers to a branch (i.e., a name that,
when prepended with "refs/heads/", is a valid ref), then that
branch is checked out. Otherwise, if it refers to a valid commit,
your HEAD becomes "detached" and you are no longer on any branch
(see below for details).
As a special case, the "@{-N}" syntax for the N-th last branch
checks out the branch (instead of detaching). You may also specify
- which is synonymous with "@{-1}".
As a further special case, you may use "A...B" as a shortcut for
the merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You
can leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to
HEAD.
<new_branch>
Name for the new branch.
<start_point>
The name of a commit at which to start the new branch; see git-
branch(1) for details. Defaults to HEAD.
<tree-ish>
Tree to checkout from (when paths are given). If not specified, the
index will be used.
DETACHED HEAD
HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. master). Meanwhile, each
branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
commits, one of them tagged, and with branch master checked out:
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
|
v
a---b---c branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer
to the new commit. Specifically, git commit creates a new commit d,
whose parent is commit c, and then updates branch master to refer to
new commit d. HEAD still refers to branch master and so indirectly now
refers to commit d:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
|
v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
checkout commit b (here we show two ways this may be done):
$ git checkout v2.0 # or
$ git checkout master^^
HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
|
v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now
refers directly to commit b. This is known as being in detached HEAD
state. It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as
opposed to referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we
create a commit:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
|
v
e
/
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
There is now a new commit e, but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
of course add yet another commit in this state:
$ edit; git add; git commit
HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
|
v
e---f
/
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
In fact, we can perform all the normal Git operations. But, let's look
at what happens when we then checkout master:
$ git checkout master
HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
e---f |
/ v
a---b---c---d branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
^
|
tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
f. Eventually commit f (and by extension commit e) will be deleted by
the routine Git garbage collection process, unless we create a
reference before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from
commit f, any of these will create a reference to it:
$ git checkout -b foo (1)
$ git branch foo (2)
$ git tag foo (3)
1. creates a new branch foo, which refers to commit f, and then updates
HEAD to refer to branch foo. In other words, we'll no longer be in
detached HEAD state after this command.
2. similarly creates a new branch foo, which refers to commit f, but
leaves HEAD detached.
3. creates a new tag foo, which refers to commit f, leaving HEAD
detached.
If we have moved away from commit f, then we must first recover its
object name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a
reference to it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD
referred, we can use either of these commands:
$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
$ git log -g -2 HEAD
EXAMPLES
1. The following sequence checks out the master branch, reverts the
Makefile to two revisions back, deletes hello.c by mistake, and
gets it back from the index.
$ git checkout master (1)
$ git checkout master~2 Makefile (2)
$ rm -f hello.c
$ git checkout hello.c (3)
1. switch branch
2. take a file out of another commit
3. restore hello.c from the index
If you want to check out all C source files out of the index, you
can say
$ git checkout -- '*.c'
Note the quotes around *.c. The file hello.c will also be checked
out, even though it is no longer in the working tree, because the
file globbing is used to match entries in the index (not in the
working tree by the shell).
If you have an unfortunate branch that is named hello.c, this step
would be confused as an instruction to switch to that branch. You
should instead write:
$ git checkout -- hello.c
2. After working in the wrong branch, switching to the correct branch
would be done using:
$ git checkout mytopic
However, your "wrong" branch and correct "mytopic" branch may
differ in files that you have modified locally, in which case the
above checkout would fail like this:
$ git checkout mytopic
error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
You can give the -m flag to the command, which would try a
three-way merge:
$ git checkout -m mytopic
Auto-merging frotz
After this three-way merge, the local modifications are not
registered in your index file, so git diff would show you what
changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
3. When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with the -m
option, you would see something like this:
$ git checkout -m mytopic
Auto-merging frotz
ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
fatal: merge program failed
At this point, git diff shows the changes cleanly merged as in the
previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted files.
Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with git add as
usual:
$ edit frotz
$ git add frotz
GIT
Part of the git(1) suite
Git 1.8.3.1 07/30/2024 GIT-CHECKOUT(1)
Linux-Distributionen
Huschi als Linux-Admin